{"id":20017,"date":"2026-05-12T08:59:33","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T06:59:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/?p=20017"},"modified":"2026-05-12T08:59:33","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T06:59:33","slug":"botosani-locul-27-in-romania-dupa-bugetul-municipal-dependenta-de-56-fata-de-finantarea-centrala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/2026\/05\/12\/botosani-locul-27-in-romania-dupa-bugetul-municipal-dependenta-de-56-fata-de-finantarea-centrala\/","title":{"rendered":"Boto\u0219ani, locul 27 \u00een Rom\u00e2nia dup\u0103 bugetul municipal: dependen\u021b\u0103 de 56% fa\u021b\u0103 de finan\u021barea central\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cum arat\u0103 finan\u021bele localit\u0103\u021bilor jude\u021bului fa\u021b\u0103 de Moldova \u0219i fa\u021b\u0103 de Rom\u00e2nia<\/h1>\n

Un document publicat de Ministerul Finan\u021belor ofer\u0103, pentru prima dat\u0103 \u00eentr-o form\u0103 comparabil\u0103, o radiografie complet\u0103 a s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii financiare a fiec\u0103rei localit\u0103\u021bi din Rom\u00e2nia. Cifrele sunt reci, obiective \u0219i- pentru Boto\u0219ani – mai degrab\u0103 \u00eengrijor\u0103toare dec\u00e2t reconfortante. BanulBotosanean.ro a analizat datele pentru toate localit\u0103\u021bile jude\u021bului, le-a comparat cu cele din Moldova \u0219i a calculat pozi\u021bia municipiului re\u0219edin\u021b\u0103 \u00een clasamentul na\u021bional.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Exist\u0103 o diferen\u021b\u0103 esen\u021bial\u0103 \u00eentre a administra un buget mare \u0219i a administra bine un buget. Primul indicator este cel al volumul total al veniturilor nete, spune c\u00e2t de mult prime\u0219te o localitate. Al doilea este procentul veniturilor proprii din total, care spune c\u00e2t de mult produce localitatea din ce are nevoie \u00eentr-un an. Iar aceast\u0103 distinc\u021bie, aparent tehnic\u0103, are consecin\u021be foarte concrete: o localitate cu venituri proprii ridicate este mai autonom\u0103, mai pu\u021bin vulnerabil\u0103 la t\u0103ierile de la centru \u0219i mai capabil\u0103 s\u0103-\u0219i finan\u021beze propria dezvoltare. Una cu venituri proprii mici depinde, an de an, de bun\u0103voin\u021ba Guvernului.<\/p>\n

Datele din Situa\u021bia bugetelor locale 2025<\/strong> traseaz\u0103 aceast\u0103 hart\u0103 cu o precizie nemiloas\u0103.<\/p>\n

Jude\u021bul Boto\u0219ani: cine conduce \u0219i cine r\u0103m\u00e2ne \u00een urm\u0103<\/h2>\n

Topul localit\u0103\u021bilor dup\u0103 volumul bugetului<\/h3>\n

Ierarhia financiar\u0103 a jude\u021bului este dominat\u0103 cu autoritate de municipiul re\u0219edin\u021b\u0103. Urmeaz\u0103, cu bugete semnificativ mai mici, celelalte ora\u0219e \u0219i c\u00e2teva comune care surprind prin dinamism.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Loc<\/th>\nLocalitate<\/th>\nVenituri Nete (lei)<\/th>\nVenituri Proprii (lei)<\/th>\n% VP<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nMunicipiul Boto\u0219ani<\/strong><\/td>\n509.307.834<\/td>\n221.133.940<\/td>\n43,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nMunicipiul Dorohoi<\/strong><\/td>\n121.311.438<\/td>\n57.810.620<\/td>\n47,65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Darabani<\/strong><\/td>\n81.964.811<\/td>\n17.265.188<\/td>\n21,06%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Fl\u0103m\u00e2nzi<\/strong><\/td>\n67.283.350<\/td>\n14.539.493<\/td>\n21,61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul S\u0103veni<\/strong><\/td>\n44.728.706<\/td>\n11.573.610<\/td>\n25,88%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nComuna R\u01cechi\u021bi<\/strong><\/td>\n45.918.693<\/td>\n8.222.376<\/td>\n17,91%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul \u0218tef\u0103ne\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n25.409.125<\/td>\n9.269.772<\/td>\n36,48%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nComuna Hav\u00e2rna<\/strong><\/td>\n25.299.737<\/td>\n4.924.013<\/td>\n19,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nComuna Tru\u0219e\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n24.928.695<\/td>\n7.005.575<\/td>\n28,10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nComuna R\u0103u\u0219eni<\/strong><\/td>\n24.384.985<\/td>\n3.205.960<\/td>\n13,15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Bucecea<\/strong><\/td>\n21.244.445<\/td>\n7.615.157<\/td>\n35,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nComuna Roma<\/strong><\/td>\n21.005.540<\/td>\n5.640.887<\/td>\n26,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nComuna B\u0103lu\u0219eni<\/strong><\/td>\n21.006.529<\/td>\n5.234.241<\/td>\n24,92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Darabani<\/strong><\/td>\n19.161.962<\/td>\n\u2014<\/td>\n\u2014<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nComuna Corni<\/strong><\/td>\n35.607.784<\/td>\n7.999.188<\/td>\n22,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul St\u0103uceni<\/strong><\/td>\n29.316.428<\/td>\n4.696.119<\/td>\n16,02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nComuna Vorona<\/strong><\/td>\n34.721.185<\/td>\n7.470.788<\/td>\n21,52%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nComuna H\u00e2nte\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n34.332.006<\/td>\n4.510.464<\/td>\n13,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nComuna Br\u0103e\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n29.616.968<\/td>\n2.787.982<\/td>\n9,41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nComuna Curte\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n18.799.422<\/td>\n9.210.656<\/td>\n48,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Not\u0103: Tabelul include primele 20 de localit\u0103\u021bi cu cele mai mari bugete identificate \u00een jude\u021bul Boto\u0219ani.<\/em><\/p>\n

Topul localit\u0103\u021bilor dup\u0103 procentul veniturilor proprii<\/h3>\n

Un clasament complet diferit apare c\u00e2nd privim nu volumul, ci calitatea financiar\u0103 \u2014 adic\u0103 \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 fiecare localitate \u00ee\u0219i genereaz\u0103 propriile resurse:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Loc<\/th>\nLocalitate<\/th>\n% Venituri Proprii<\/th>\nVenituri Nete (lei)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nComuna V\u01cecule\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n51,50%<\/td>\n5.450.692<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nMunicipiul Dorohoi<\/strong><\/td>\n47,65%<\/td>\n121.311.438<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nComuna Curte\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n48,99%<\/td>\n18.799.422<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nMunicipiul Boto\u0219ani<\/strong><\/td>\n43,42%<\/td>\n509.307.834<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul \u0218tef\u0103ne\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n36,48%<\/td>\n25.409.125<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Bucecea<\/strong><\/td>\n35,85%<\/td>\n21.244.445<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nComuna Tru\u0219e\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n28,10%<\/td>\n24.928.695<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nComuna Roma<\/strong><\/td>\n26,85%<\/td>\n21.005.540<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul S\u0103veni<\/strong><\/td>\n25,88%<\/td>\n44.728.706<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nComuna Hlipiceni<\/strong><\/td>\n26,03%<\/td>\n13.594.760<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Concluzia acestui clasament este nea\u0219teptat\u0103:<\/strong> Dorohoiul, cu un buget de doar 121 de milioane de lei, are o autonomie financiar\u0103 mai mare dec\u00e2t municipiul Boto\u0219ani. La polul opus, localit\u0103\u021bi ca Br\u0103e\u0219ti (9,41%) sau R\u0103useni (13,15%) tr\u0103iesc aproape exclusiv din banii veni\u021bi de la centru, o vulnerabilitate structural\u0103 care le face practic dependente de orice schimbare de politic\u0103 fiscal\u0103 na\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nLocalitate<\/th>\nVenituri Nete (lei)<\/th>\nVenituri Proprii (lei)<\/th>\n% VP<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nMunicipiul Boto\u0219ani<\/strong><\/td>\n509.307.834<\/td>\n221.133.940<\/td>\n43,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Darabani<\/strong><\/td>\n81.964.811<\/td>\n17.265.188<\/td>\n21,06%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nMunicipiul Dorohoi<\/strong><\/td>\n121.311.438<\/td>\n57.810.620<\/td>\n47,65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Fl\u0103m\u00e2nzi<\/strong><\/td>\n67.283.350<\/td>\n14.539.493<\/td>\n21,61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul S\u0103veni<\/strong><\/td>\n44.728.706<\/td>\n11.573.610<\/td>\n25,88%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul \u0218tef\u0103ne\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n25.409.125<\/td>\n9.269.772<\/td>\n36,48%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nOra\u0219ul Bucecea<\/strong><\/td>\n21.244.445<\/td>\n7.615.157<\/td>\n35,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nComuna St\u0103uceni<\/strong><\/td>\n29.316.428<\/td>\n4.696.119<\/td>\n16,02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nComuna Vorona<\/strong><\/td>\n34.721.185<\/td>\n7.470.788<\/td>\n21,52%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nComuna Hude\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n18.233.489<\/td>\n6.492.479<\/td>\n35,61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nComuna Tru\u0219e\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n24.928.695<\/td>\n7.005.575<\/td>\n28,10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nComuna R\u01cechi\u021bi<\/strong><\/td>\n45.918.693<\/td>\n8.222.376<\/td>\n17,91%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nComuna Leorda<\/strong><\/td>\n14.691.508<\/td>\n2.930.998<\/td>\n19,95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nComuna Copal\u0103u<\/strong><\/td>\n17.049.840<\/td>\n5.018.985<\/td>\n29,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nComuna Ib\u0103ne\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n16.892.115<\/td>\n4.363.986<\/td>\n25,83%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nComuna Mih\u0103ileni<\/strong><\/td>\n18.256.313<\/td>\n2.864.412<\/td>\n15,69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nComuna Hlipiceni<\/strong><\/td>\n13.594.760<\/td>\n3.538.821<\/td>\n26,03%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nComuna Todireni<\/strong><\/td>\n12.743.174<\/td>\n4.443.544<\/td>\n34,87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nComuna Suli\u021ba<\/strong><\/td>\n13.280.635<\/td>\n3.833.527<\/td>\n28,87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nComuna Lunca<\/strong><\/td>\n13.517.003<\/td>\n4.258.220<\/td>\n31,50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nComuna Nicseni<\/strong><\/td>\n12.334.674<\/td>\n2.860.144<\/td>\n23,19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nComuna D\u00e2ngeni<\/strong><\/td>\n13.182.571<\/td>\n3.675.079<\/td>\n27,88%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nComuna Gorbane\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n12.407.522<\/td>\n3.636.677<\/td>\n29,31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nComuna V\u0103cule\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n5.450.692<\/td>\n2.807.297<\/td>\n51,50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nComuna Roma<\/strong><\/td>\n21.005.540<\/td>\n5.640.887<\/td>\n26,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26<\/td>\nComuna Mihal\u0103\u0219eni<\/strong><\/td>\n14.317.878<\/td>\n2.961.644<\/td>\n20,68%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27<\/td>\nComuna Frumusica<\/strong><\/td>\n16.553.611<\/td>\n5.252.715<\/td>\n31,73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28<\/td>\nComuna Dim\u0103cheni<\/strong><\/td>\n5.224.559<\/td>\n2.059.794<\/td>\n39,43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29<\/td>\nComuna R\u0103useni<\/strong><\/td>\n24.384.985<\/td>\n3.205.960<\/td>\n13,15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30<\/td>\nComuna Dob\u00e2rceni<\/strong><\/td>\n7.413.783<\/td>\n2.797.070<\/td>\n37,73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
31<\/td>\nComuna Mileanca<\/strong><\/td>\n14.760.447<\/td>\n2.971.357<\/td>\n20,13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32<\/td>\nComuna Hav\u00e2rna<\/strong><\/td>\n25.299.737<\/td>\n4.924.013<\/td>\n19,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33<\/td>\nComuna Adaseni<\/strong><\/td>\n6.150.075<\/td>\n2.404.796<\/td>\n39,10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
34<\/td>\nComuna B\u0103lu\u0219eni<\/strong><\/td>\n21.006.529<\/td>\n5.234.241<\/td>\n24,92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
35<\/td>\nComuna Br\u0103e\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n29.616.968<\/td>\n2.787.982<\/td>\n9,41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
36<\/td>\nComuna Cop\u0103l\u0103u<\/strong><\/td>\n17.049.840<\/td>\n5.018.985<\/td>\n29,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
37<\/td>\nComuna Curte\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n18.799.422<\/td>\n9.210.656<\/td>\n48,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38<\/td>\nComuna Dersca<\/strong><\/td>\n23.515.581<\/td>\n3.624.711<\/td>\n15,41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
39<\/td>\nComuna H\u0103ne\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n34.332.006<\/td>\n4.510.464<\/td>\n13,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
40<\/td>\nComuna Brosc\u0103u\u021bi<\/strong><\/td>\n18.210.265<\/td>\n3.541.983<\/td>\n19,45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41<\/td>\nComuna Un\u021beni<\/strong><\/td>\n15.754.324<\/td>\n3.071.035<\/td>\n19,49%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
42<\/td>\nComuna Manoleasa<\/strong><\/td>\n15.751.765<\/td>\n3.881.582<\/td>\n24,64%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
43<\/td>\nComuna Conce\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\n16.091.424<\/td>\n2.286.793<\/td>\n14,21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
44<\/td>\nComuna Corni<\/strong><\/td>\n35.607.784<\/td>\n7.999.188<\/td>\n22,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Municipiul Boto\u0219ani \u00een Rom\u00e2nia: locul 27 din 100+<\/h2>\n

Dintr-un clasament na\u021bional care cuprinde peste 3.000 de localit\u0103\u021bi, municipiul Boto\u0219ani se pozi\u021bioneaz\u0103 pe locul 27 din totalul municipiilor \u0219i ora\u0219elor cu buget peste 500 de milioane de lei.<\/strong> Fa\u021b\u0103 de celelalte municipii re\u0219edin\u021b\u0103 de jude\u021b, Boto\u0219aniul se plaseaz\u0103 \u00een jum\u0103tatea inferioar\u0103 a ierarhiei, cu un buget de 509 milioane lei<\/strong>, la distan\u021b\u0103 considerabil\u0103 de Bucure\u0219ti (5,8 miliarde), Cluj-Napoca (2,2 miliarde) sau Ia\u0219i (1,88 miliarde).<\/p>\n

Mai semnificativ este \u00eens\u0103 procentul de venituri proprii: 43,42%,<\/strong>\u00a0unul dintre cele mai sc\u0103zute dintre municipiile re\u0219edin\u021b\u0103 de jude\u021b din Rom\u00e2nia. Gala\u021biul, cu un procent similar (41,75%), confirm\u0103 c\u0103 jude\u021bele cu economie industrial\u0103 \u00een restructurare \u0219i migra\u021bie ridicat\u0103 au o capacitate proprie de generare a veniturilor semnificativ mai mic\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de centrele universitare sau industriale dinamice.<\/p>\n

Boto\u0219ani prime\u0219te mai mult de la centru dec\u00e2t produce el \u00eensu\u0219i. Iar aceast\u0103 realitate, vizibil\u0103 \u00een date, este una dintre cele mai importante provoc\u0103ri structurale ale ora\u0219ului.<\/p>\n

Moldova: un top regional care pune lucrurile \u00een perspectiv\u0103<\/h2>\n

Primele 20 de localit\u0103\u021bi din Moldova dup\u0103 volumul bugetului<\/h3>\n

Regiunea istoric\u0103 Moldova \u2014 jude\u021bele Boto\u0219ani, Ia\u0219i, Suceava, Neam\u021b, Bac\u0103u, Vaslui, Gala\u021bi \u0219i Vrancea \u2014 are o ierarhie financiar\u0103 clar\u0103, dominat\u0103 de marile centre urbane:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Loc<\/th>\nLocalitate<\/th>\nJude\u021b<\/th>\nVenituri Nete (lei)<\/th>\n% VP<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nMunicipiul Ia\u0219i<\/strong><\/td>\nIa\u0219i<\/td>\n1.888.851.203<\/td>\n65,33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nMunicipiul Gala\u021bi<\/strong><\/td>\nGala\u021bi<\/td>\n1.390.335.870<\/td>\n41,75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nMunicipiul Bac\u0103u<\/strong><\/td>\nBac\u0103u<\/td>\n811.011.637<\/td>\n55,79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nMunicipiul Foc\u0219ani<\/strong><\/td>\nVrancea<\/td>\n402.191.862<\/td>\n53,93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nMunicipiul Vaslui<\/strong><\/td>\nVaslui<\/td>\n344.303.891<\/td>\n35,92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nMunicipiul Piatra-Neam\u021b<\/strong><\/td>\nNeam\u021b<\/td>\n323.064.034<\/td>\n59,13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nMunicipiul Suceava<\/strong><\/td>\nSuceava<\/td>\n519.776.129<\/td>\n60,25%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nMunicipiul Boto\u0219ani<\/strong><\/td>\nBoto\u0219ani<\/td>\n509.307.834<\/td>\n43,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nMunicipiul Roman<\/strong><\/td>\nNeam\u021b<\/td>\n244.984.653<\/td>\n46,63%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nMunicipiul Tecuci<\/strong><\/td>\nGala\u021bi<\/td>\n225.200.690<\/td>\n28,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nMunicipiul B\u00e2rlad<\/strong><\/td>\nVaslui<\/td>\n207.202.219<\/td>\n46,45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nMunicipiul One\u0219ti<\/strong><\/td>\nBac\u0103u<\/td>\n163.038.708<\/td>\n58,84%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nMunicipiul F\u0103lticeni<\/strong><\/td>\nSuceava<\/td>\n108.303.716<\/td>\n54,60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nMunicipiul Adjud<\/strong><\/td>\nVrancea<\/td>\n104.315.908<\/td>\n52,67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nMunicipiul Dorohoi<\/strong><\/td>\nBoto\u0219ani<\/td>\n121.311.438<\/td>\n47,65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nMunicipiul Hu\u0219i<\/strong><\/td>\nVaslui<\/td>\n103.042.738<\/td>\n38,11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nMunicipiul Pa\u0219cani<\/strong><\/td>\nIa\u0219i<\/td>\n114.600.080<\/td>\n50,73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nComuna Miroslava<\/strong><\/td>\nIa\u0219i<\/td>\n170.562.519<\/td>\n53,50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nMunicipiul C\u00e2mpulung Moldovenesc<\/strong><\/td>\nSuceava<\/td>\n108.768.206<\/td>\n35,75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\nMunicipiul R\u0103d\u0103u\u021bi<\/strong><\/td>\nSuceava<\/td>\n99.384.820<\/td>\n65,57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Ce spune acest top?<\/h3>\n

C\u00e2teva observa\u021bii care merit\u0103 aten\u021bie:<\/p>\n

Ia\u0219ul domin\u0103 f\u0103r\u0103 drept de apel \u0219i arat\u0103 c\u0103 este Dubaiul Moldovei.<\/strong> Cu aproape 1,9 miliarde de lei<\/strong> \u0219i un procent de autonomie financiar\u0103 de 65,33%<\/strong>, Ia\u0219ul este de departe cel mai puternic centru financiar al Moldovei \u2014 \u0219i unul dintre cele mai s\u0103n\u0103toase municipii din Rom\u00e2nia. Universit\u0103\u021bi, servicii, IT, comer\u021b: diversitatea economic\u0103 se vede direct \u00een buget.<\/p>\n

Gala\u021biul produce mai pu\u021bin dec\u00e2t pare.<\/strong> Cu al doilea buget din regiune, 1,39 miliarde de lei, <\/strong>Gala\u021biul are totu\u0219i un procent de venituri proprii de doar 41,75%<\/strong>, aproape identic cu Boto\u0219aniul. Mo\u0219tenirea industrial\u0103 \u00een declin \u0219i migra\u021bia masiv\u0103 explic\u0103 par\u021bial aceast\u0103 discrepan\u021b\u0103.<\/p>\n

Suceava dep\u0103\u0219e\u0219te Boto\u0219aniul, la numai 10 milioane de lei distan\u021b\u0103.<\/strong> Cele dou\u0103 jude\u021be vecine sunt aproape la egalitate ca buget total al capitalei de jude\u021b, Suceava cu 519 milioane<\/strong>, Boto\u0219ani cu 509 milioane, <\/strong>dar Suceava are o autonomie financiar\u0103 semnificativ mai mare: 60,25%<\/strong> fa\u021b\u0103 de 43,42%<\/strong>. O diferen\u021b\u0103 care se traduce \u00een rezilien\u021b\u0103 fiscal\u0103 pe termen lung.<\/p>\n

Surpriza regiunii: Comuna Miroslava.<\/strong> O comun\u0103 din jude\u021bul Ia\u0219i apare pe locul 18 \u00een topul regional, cu un buget de 170 de milioane de lei<\/strong> \u0219i 53,50% venituri proprii. Expansiunea reziden\u021bei \u00een jurul Ia\u0219ului a transformat Miroslava dintr-un sat \u00een una dintre cele mai bogate localit\u0103\u021bi rurale din Moldova, \u0219i un exemplu dureros pentru ce ar fi putut deveni comunele din jurul Boto\u0219aniului dac\u0103 dinamica economic\u0103 ar fi fost diferit\u0103.<\/p>\n

Cifrele nu mint, dar cer context<\/h2>\n

Datele din situa\u021bia bugetelor locale 2025 nu sunt un verdict, ci o diagnoz\u0103. Boto\u0219aniul nu este un caz disperat, este, \u00een continuare, al optulea cel mai mare buget municipal din Moldova \u0219i se afl\u0103 \u00een top 30 na\u021bional ca volum. Dar structura acestui buget, cu mai pu\u021bin de jum\u0103tate din venituri generate local, semnaleaz\u0103 o fragilitate real\u0103.<\/p>\n

Solu\u021biile nu vin din tabel, ci din politici: atragere de investi\u021bii, cre\u0219terea bazei fiscale locale, dezvoltarea serviciilor \u0219i a for\u021bei de munc\u0103 active. P\u00e2n\u0103 atunci, Boto\u0219aniul r\u0103m\u00e2ne un municipiu care tr\u0103ie\u0219te, \u00een propor\u021bie de peste 56%, din banii altora.<\/p>\n

Iar asta, \u00een orice limbaj, \u00eenseamn\u0103 dependen\u021b\u0103.<\/p>\n

Datele provin din Situa\u021bia bugetelor locale 2025<\/strong>, publicat\u0103 de Ministerul Finan\u021belor Publice. Analiza a fost realizat\u0103 pe baza documentului integral.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cum arat\u0103 finan\u021bele localit\u0103\u021bilor jude\u021bului fa\u021b\u0103 de Moldova \u0219i fa\u021b\u0103 de Rom\u00e2nia Un document publicat de Ministerul Finan\u021belor ofer\u0103, pentru prima dat\u0103 \u00eentr-o form\u0103 comparabil\u0103, o radiografie complet\u0103 a s\u0103n\u0103t\u0103\u021bii financiare a fiec\u0103rei localit\u0103\u021bi din Rom\u00e2nia. Cifrele sunt reci, obiective \u0219i- pentru Boto\u0219ani – mai degrab\u0103 \u00eengrijor\u0103toare dec\u00e2t reconfortante. BanulBotosanean.ro a analizat datele pentru toate<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20018,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,4],"tags":[10303,7235,10300,10311,3771,10285,10308,10306,10309,10305,10301,10307,10304,10302,10310],"class_list":{"0":"post-20017","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economic","8":"category-stiri-botosani","9":"tag-autonomie-financiara-localitati-romania","10":"tag-banulbotosanean","11":"tag-bugete-locale-2025","12":"tag-clasament-bugete-municipii-romania-2025","13":"tag-dezvoltare-locala-botosani","14":"tag-economic-botosani","15":"tag-finante-publice-locale-romania","16":"tag-iasi-buget-municipal","17":"tag-localitati-botosani-buget","18":"tag-ministerul-finantelor-bugete-locale","19":"tag-municipiul-botosani-buget","20":"tag-suceava-vs-botosani-buget","21":"tag-top-bugete-municipii-moldova","22":"tag-venituri-proprii-localitati","23":"tag-venituri-proprii-procent-municipii"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20017"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20017\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20019,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20017\/revisions\/20019"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20018"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/banulbotosanean.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}